The Broad Picture

Overstanding what they're doing.

Month: March, 2012

Syria… And Other Victims

Its confirmed that Saudi Arabia is shipping arms to foreign fighters and Syrian rebels operating out of Jordan. The Australian reports in their article, “Bombs in Syria as Saudis ‘send arms to rebels’,” that “Saudi military equipment is on its way to Jordan to arm the Free Syrian Army,” quoting an Arab diplomat. Of course, as reported below, the “Free Syrian Army” is led not by Syrians, but by NATO-backed Libyan militants from the US State Department-listed terrorist organization, ‘The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group’.

It should be noted that Saudi Arabia in turn, receives its weapons and a significant amount of military funding from the United States.

The United Arab Emirates also purchase a massive amount of arms from the usual suspects on an almost annual basis.

Lockheed Martin seals $3.48 billion weapons deal with United Arab Emirates (Published 08:17 31.12.11)

Weapons buyers and respective values since 2009 :

  • Saudi Arabia  – $13.8 billion
  • The United Arab Emirates – $10.4 billion
  • Egypt  – $7.8 billion
  • Taiwan   – $6.6 billion
  • Australia – $6.4 billion
  • Iraq – $5.6 billion
  • Pakistan – $4.1 billion
  • UK – $4 billion
  • Turkey – $3.8 billion
  • South Korea – $3.1 billion

$900 billion plus is spent on military budgets worldwide per annum, approximately 50% of this is spent within the United States of America, who’s Pentagon wasted on average $9000 per second prior to September the 11th 2001.

March 18, 2012 – A twin terrorist bombing in the Syrian capital of Damascus, allegedly targeting government buildings, ripped through a Christian neighborhood killing an estimated 27, mostly civilians. A third bomb exploded, killing only the driver of the car it was placed in, in what was apparently an attempted triple suicide bombing. CBS News reports (1) that after other similar attacks, U.S. officials suggest Al Qaeda terrorists “may be” amongst the Syrian rebels. However, while the West attempts to portray this as an unexpected development, we shall see that it not only was likely, but in fact the premeditated modus operandi of Western-backed destabilization efforts directed at upturning not only Syria, but the entire Arab World.

Robert J. Stevens – (Weapons / Bio Weapons), Lockheed Martin – Chairman CEO, Monsanto – Board, Aerospace Industries Association – Governor, CFR, Atlantic Council – International Advisory Board, British-American Business Council – International Advisory Board, Lockheed Martin received $36 billion in government contracts in 2008 more than any company in history, Bilderberg, Forbes ranked in the 100’s, New Leadership for America PAC|

From the beginning the Committee of 300 (through their US military arm) has been directly behind the unrest in Syria. In fact, involvement in destabilizing Syria began years before the admittedly ‘US-engineered’ Arab Spring (2) even unfolded in a premeditated plot to upturn the entire Arab World and reorder it according to their own corporate-financier and hegemonic geopolitical interests.

In a 2007 speech given to the Commonwealth Club of California (3), US Army General Wesley Clark would state that in 1991, then Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz said the US had 5-10 years to clean up the old Soviet “client regimes” before the next super power rose up and challenged western hegemony. Clark claimed that this, along with the aftermath of 9/11 constituted a policy coup where Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and the other members of the of Project for a New American Century had hijacked US foreign policy to destabilize and turn the nations of the Middle East upside down – much the way they are now.



Paul Wolfowitz – World Bank – President, CFR, PNAC Founding Member, Trilateral Comission, JINSA, Neocon, Aspen Strategy Group, AEI, Weekly Standard Contributor, Bilderberg, Wolfowitz taught in the Department of Political Science at Yale and one of his former students was Lewis Libby, George H W Bush’s Team B |

Dick Cheney CFR, Bilderberg, Trilateral Comission, PNAC Founding Member, JINSA, Neo-Con,  Aspen Strategy Group, his Death Squads or Joint Special Operations Command, Haliburton – CEO (Former, on tendering his resignation took a 30 million dollar severance payout and retained 400,000 Haliburton Stock), Prior to 9-11 changed the NORAD protocols to have Bush Rumsfeld and himself be the only persons able to call for stand downs|

Donald ‘The Real Chemical Ali’ Rumsfeld(Misc, Pharmaceuticals), Bohemian Club, CFR, Bilderberg, PNAC, Neo-Con, ‘Gilead’ – Board 1988-Present, ‘Gilead’  joined Gilead as a director in 1988 Chairman 1997–2001, G.D. Searle Pharmaceutical Company – CEO/Chairman/President 1977–1985, General Instrument Corporation – Chairman (Electronics / Broadband), Rand Corporation – Chairman of Board from 1981–1986 then 1995-1996 / Board Of Trustees, ABB AB – Directorate, Gulfstream Aerospace Corp – Former Director, Kellogg – Directorate 1985–1999, Metricom Inc – Former director,  Sears Roebuck and Co – Directorate, Tribune Company – Former Director, Eisenhower Exchange Fellowship – Board Of Trustees, Freedom House – Board Of Trustees, Hoover Institution – Board of trustees, Center For Security Policy – Longtime associate – winner of the CSP’s 1998 “Keeper of the Flame” award, ‘Committee For The Free World’ – Former Chairman, Bechtel Corporation Advisory (Was involved in Iraq-Bechtel negotiations in the 1980s on a pipeline project), Amylin Pharmaceuticals – Former director, Joined GD Searle in 1977 then went into Rand 4 years later, Sold the following to Saddam Hussein in 1985 : Sarin Nerve Gas, Soman, Tabun, VX Nerve Gas, Lewisite, Cyanogen Chloride, Hydrogen Cyanide, blister agents and Mustard Gas. Some of the powerful biological agents sold included Anthrax, Clostridium Botulinum, Histoplasma Capsulatum (causes a tuberculosis-like disease) , Brucella Melitensis, Clostridium Perfringens and Escherichia Coli, but also in 1985 was put into two additional sectors ie Food and Communications, had a little break, then got back into pharmaceuticals 3 years later|

Clark would go on to say that shortly after September 11, 2001, while at the Pentagon, a document handed down from the Office of the Secretary of Defense indicated plans to attack and destroy the governments of 7 countries; Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Iran, Lebanon and Libya.

Clearly the Committee of 300 has already “attacked and destroyed” Iraq, which in 2003 was invaded and subsequently occupied for nearly a decade at the cost of nearly a million lives including over 4,400 US soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines, and trillions of dollars of taxpayer money. Likewise Libya was destabilized and invaded by proxy through a combination of US-led NATO forces and US State Department listed terrorist organizations including the (Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (listed #27) lead by Abdul Hakim Belhaj.

Somalia has been the victim of repeated US-backed invasions by Ethiopia (4), Uganda, Kenya (5), and systematic air (6) and drone campaigns (7) carried out by the recently established US Africa Command (AFRICOM), while neighboring Sudan has been carved into two separate states, isolating the oil-rich south (8) with further intervention pending as public support is built by stunts including the fraudulent Kony 2012 video and George Clooney’s pro-imperial intervention advocacy.

US designs toward Iran serve as a model for Syria.

Iran has likewise been under systematic premeditated attack for years, including brutal sanctions, and the training, arming, and funding of US State Department-listed foreign terror organization (listed #29), Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MEK) to carry out terrorist attacks within Iran, as well as the constant threat of unilateral attack by either Israel or the US, or both – all of which was described in minute detail in 2009 amongst the pages of US policy think-tank Brookings Institution’s “Which Path to Persia?” report (9).

In this report, they openly conspire to use what is an admitted terrorist organization as a “US proxy” :

“Perhaps the most prominent (and certainly the most controversial) opposition group that has attracted attention as a potential U.S. proxy is the NCRI (National Council of Resistance of Iran), the political movement established by the MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq). Critics believe the group to be undemocratic and unpopular, and indeed anti-American.

In contrast, the group’s champions contend that the movement’s long-standing opposition to the Iranian regime and record of successful attacks on and intelligence-gathering operations against the regime make it worthy of U.S. support. They also argue that the group is no longer anti-American and question the merit of earlier accusations. Raymond Tanter, one of the group’s supporters in the United States, contends that the MEK and the NCRI are allies for regime change in Tehranand also act as a useful proxy for gathering intelligence. The MEK’s greatest intelligence coup was the provision of intelligence in 2002 that led to the discovery of a secret site in Iran for enriching uranium.

Despite its defenders’ claims, the MEK remains on the U.S. government list of foreign terrorist organizations. In the 1970s, the group killed three U.S. officers and three civilian contractors in Iran. During the 1979-1980 hostage crisis, the group praised the decision to take America hostages and Elaine Sciolino reported that while group leaders publicly condemned the 9/11 attacks, within the group celebrations were widespread.

Undeniably, the group has conducted terrorist attacks—often excused by the MEK’s advocates because they are directed against the Iranian government. For example, in 1981, the group bombed the headquarters of the Islamic Republic Party, which was then the clerical leadership’s main political organization, killing an estimated 70 senior officials. More recently, the group has claimed credit for over a dozen mortar attacks, assassinations, and other assaults on Iranian civilian and military targets between 1998 and 2001. At the very least, to work more closely with the group (at least in an overt manner), Washington would need to remove it from the list of foreign terrorist organizations.”

– page 117-118of “Which Path to Persia?“ Brookings Institution, 2009

Again Brookings Institution is another assortment of the world’s arseholes and psycopaths that crops up again and again in my research into people. Time and effort would be best saved if we forget about the public front ‘political parties’ such as Republicans, Democrats, Labour etc and concentrate on the actual parties maneuvering unmonitored in the background.

It was also revealed in Seymour Hersh’s 2008 New Yorker article “Preparing the Battlefield,” that not only had MEK been considered for their role as a possible proxy, but that the US had already begun arming and financing them to wage war inside Iran:

“The M.E.K. has been on the State Department’s terrorist list for more than a decade, yet in recent years the group has received arms and intelligence, directly or indirectly, from the United States. Some of the newly authorized covert funds, the Pentagon consultant told me, may well end up in M.E.K. coffers. “The new task force will work with the M.E.K. The Administration is desperate for results.” He added, “The M.E.K. has no C.P.A. auditing the books, and its leaders are thought to have been lining their pockets for years. If people only knew what the M.E.K. is getting, and how much is going to its bank accounts—and yet it is almost useless for the purposes the Administration intends.”

Seymore Hersh in an NPR interview, also claims that select MEK members have already received training in the US.

More recently, the British Daily Mail published an admission in their report titled, “Mossad training terrorists to kill Iran’s nuclear scientists, U.S. officials claim… but is Israel’s real target Obama?” by “US officials” that Israel is currently funding, training, arming, and working directly with MEK. The Daily Mail article states, “U.S. officials confirmed today that Israel has been funding and training Iranian dissidents to assassinate nuclear scientists involved in Iran’s nuclear program.” The article continues by claiming, “Washington insiders confirmed there is a close relationship between Mossad and MEK.”

Well we’ve seen the scientists being killed. Clearly then, the use of listed terrorist organizations is not an unfortunate or unexpected development in the midst of Western backed regime change operations – they are a central pillar in their planning and execution.

This leaves only Lebanon and Syria – Lebanon having suffered a brutal air assault by Israel (10) who ultimately failed to rout Hezbollah forces in the summer of 2006. Breaking the back of the Iranian-Syrian alliance that allegedly serves as the foundation of Hezbollah’s strength would next be targeted.

The overthrow of Syria’s government is a premeditated plot.

A concerted campaign to isolate, destabilize and overthrow the government of Syria began in 2002, a year after Clark was informed of the Pentagon’s plan to blitzkrieg through the Middle East. It was then that Secretary of State John Bolton added Syria to the growing “Axis of Evil (11).” It would be later revealed that Bolton’s threats against Syria manifested themselves as covert funding and support for opposition groups inside of Syria spanning both the Bush and Obama administrations.

John R. Bolton – CFR, Bilderberg, PNAC – Founding Member / Co-Signer, JINSA, Neo-Con, AEI,  National Rifle Association,  Dirty hands from Iran Contra, CPSG|

In an April 2011 CNN article (12), acting State Department spokesman Mark Toner stated, “We’re not working to undermine that [Syrian] government. What we are trying to do in Syria, through our civil society support, is to build the kind of democratic institutions, frankly, that we’re trying to do in countries around the globe. What’s different, I think, in this situation is that the Syrian government perceives this kind of assistance as a threat to its control over the Syrian people.”

Toner’s remarks came after the Washington Post released cables (13) indicating the US has been funding Syrian opposition groups since at least 2005 and continued until today.

In an April 2011 AFP report (14), Michael Posner, the assistant US Secretary of State for Human Rights and Labor, stated that the “US government has budgeted $50 million in the last two years to develop new technologies to help activists protect themselves from arrest and prosecution by authoritarian governments.”

The report went on to explain that training sessions had been organised for 5,000 activists in different parts of the world. “A session held in the Middle East about six weeks ago gathered activists from Tunisia, Egypt, Syria and Lebanon who returned to their countries with the aim of training their colleagues there”. Posner would add, “They went back and there’s a ripple effect.” That ripple effect of course is the “Arab Spring,” and in Syria’s case, the impetus for the current unrest threatening to create unrest within the nation and invite in foreign intervention.”

More recently, revelations that Syrian militants are in fact being armed, trained, funded, and even joined on the battlefield by Libya’s Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), a US State Department-listed foreign terrorist organization (listed as #27) (15) only further highlights the necessity of Syria’s government under President Assad to attempt to restore order at all costs. The Telegraph would report in November 2011 (16) that LIFG leader, Abdul Belhaj met with senior leaders of the “Free Syrian Army” on the Turkish-Syrian border. It was reported that Belhaj was pledging weapons and money (both of which he receives from NATO) as well as sending LIFG fighters to train and fight alongside Syrian militants. would confirm (17) Belhaj and his LIFG’s role in not just assisting Syrian militants but in fact leading them in NATO’s armed destabilization of Syria.

NATO and the UN are backing terrorists in the midst of military conquest disguised as “humanitarian intervention”.

Now, with terrorist bombing campaigns targeting civilians and ripping through Damascus, we see just as it was planned for in Iran, the deployment of terrorist elements and tactics to bolster efforts to topple the Syrian government. The corporate media in tandem with Pentagon officials feign ignorance in an attempt to maintain plausible deniability before a public they assume are far too ignorant to have read or comprehended their designs articulated in documents like “Which Path to Persia?”.

It is confirmed that the UN’s casualty reports are based solely on opposition “activist” accounts and not on any verifiable facts. The UN’s November 2011 human rights report was based solely on such accounts, recorded not in Syria or the surrounding region, but rather in Geneva. The report itself was compiled by Karen Koning AbuZayd who is concurrently a member of the Washington D.C. based Middle East Policy Council (18), along side current and former associates of Exxon, the US military, the CIA, the Saudi Binladin Group, the US-Qatari Business Council (19) and both former and current members of the US government.

Above – some of the corporate members of the US-Qatar Business Council, whose president coincidentally sits on the same board of directors of the Middle East Policy Center as Karen AbuZayd, co-author of the UN Human Rights Council report on Syria.

Likewise, other “human right advocates” like Amnesty International are similarly compromised – Amnesty being headed literally by a former US State Department official, Suzanne Nossel, Executive Director (20). Nossel had just finished a stint as Deputy Assistant Secretary for International Organizations at the U.S. Department of State before being appointed as head of Amnesty (21). She was also vice-president of strategy and operations for the Wall Street Journal and a media and entertainment consultant at McKinsey & Company (a Council on Foreign Relations “founding” corporate member (22)).

Amnesty International also receives funding from Wall Street speculator George Soros’ Open Society Institute (annual report page 8)(23) as well as the UK Department for International Development (page 8), the European Commission and other corporate-funded foundations.

Clearly “humanitarian concerns” are a disingenuous justification for continued meddling in Syria, with all involved notorious fabricators and harboring a staggering array of demonstratively conflicting interests.

With the addition of evidence proving the premeditated use of terrorist elements in the overthrow of sovereign foreign nations in Aspen Strategy Group / Rand Corporation / Tavistock Institute / RIIA / AEI and Committee of 300 policy planning (under the ever approving gaze of The Order of The Garter and Opus Dei), these efforts, as well as those of their busy go-betweens such as the filthy-dirty arms trading Carlyle Group and the naieve (or mind controlled) militant proxies carrying their agenda out on the ground in Syria, are exposed as illegitimate criminality of vastly unprecedented proportions.

We should be utterly ashaimed of ourselves.

Thank you for reading.


Footnotes :

1. “Twin suicide bombers kill 27 in Syrian capital,” CBS News, March 17, 2012
2. “2011 – Year of the Dupe,” Land Destroyer, December 24, 2011 – citing New York Times article, “U.S. Groups Helped Nurture Arab Uprisings,” April 14, 2011, Ron Nixon
3. “Wesley Clark on America’s Foreign Policy ‘Coup’,” FORA TV, October 3, 2007
4. “U.S. Support Key to Ethiopia’s Invasion,” USA Today, Barbara Slavin, January 8, 2007
5. “U.S. intensifies its proxy fight against al-Shabab in Somalia,” Washington Post, Craig Whitlock, November 25, 2011
6. “US Bombs Islamist Town in Somalia,” BBC, March 3, 2008
7. “US flies drones from Ethiopia to fight Somali militants,” BBC, October 28, 2011
8. “Sudan: Future Oil Exporting Powerhouse?”, March 16, 2012
9. “Brookings’ “Which Path to Perisa?” Land Destroyer, February 13, 2011 (links to original Brookings document.)
10. “Book Faults Israeli Air War in Lebanon,” New York Times, Steven Erlanger, October 14, 2007
11. “US Expands ‘Axis of Evil’,” BBC, May 6, 2002
12. “U.S. denies support for Syrian opposition tantamount to regime change,” CNN, April 18, 2011 (page 2)
13. “U.S. secretly backed Syrian opposition groups, cables released by WikiLeaks show,” Washington Post, April 18, 2011
14. “US trains activists to evade security forces,” AFP, April 8, 2011
15. “Foreign Terrorist Organizations,” US State Department retrieved March 18, 2012
16. “Leading Libyan Islamist met Free Syrian Army opposition group,” The Telegraph, November 2011Link
17. “Free Syrian Army commanded by Military Governor of Tripoli,”, December 19, 2011
18. “Middle East Policy Council Board of Directors,” Middle East Policy Council, retrieved March 18, 2012
19. “US-Qatari Business Council Members,” US-Qatari Business Council, retrieved March 18, 2012
20. “Executive Director of Amnesty International USA,” Amnesty International, retrieved March 18, 2012
21. “Hillary Clinton aide at the helm of Amnesty International USA,”, November 23, 2011
22. “Council on Foreign Relations Corporate Members,” Council on Foreign Relations, Retrieved March 18, 2012
23. “Report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2011,” Amnesty International Limited, (page 8) Retrieved March 18, 2012
24. “Report and financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2011,” Amnesty International Charity Limited, (page 8) Retrieved March 18, 2012


The Creation of Perpetual Fear – Children


Admittedly this sketch is funny to begin with, but it shouldn’t be long before it also disturbs you somewhat. Disturbing because its meant to be satire; Intended to be an “exaggeration” of a perceived misandric tendency in society, and yet, it ends up being a pretty accurate description of where we already are. It’s disturbing because what was meant to be satirical here, ended up being more like a documentary.

The fact is there must be an equal number of psychologically ill females out there walking around having similar thoughts to that of the male sex offenders that our news items scapegoat and it would be foolish to assume otherwise. However the family unit has been under persistent attack over the past four or five decades and one of the best methods through which to achieve a marked success in its destruction has been to demonise the male, or the father figure.

And so, father’s have no rights (intentional) and are further ground down by departmental organisations such as the Child Support Agency who use the child as collateral (see organisations such as Dead Beat Dads Association, link in footnotes)

The most primary functions of mainstream media are to divert the public’s collective consciousness away from matters of any real consequence or significance by whatever means necessary and to additionally create a perpetual state of fear within the subconscious mind of the viewer, again by whatever means necessary; Children and our instincts to protect them are an ideal vehicle to provoke the latter and so any excuse to have revolving segments using off-putting buzz-terms which will assist in achieving this is taken full advantage of.

When watching Television Your conscious mind doesn’t really have to take much of a hold on it because you have no say in the matter. It’s the subconscious they want it to work on because whatever the subconscious works on will ultimately work on you. It just takes more time to settle itself like a jelly poured into a mold.

… and it’s constantly active. The conscious mind is often totally unaware of some of the details and information that the subconscious mind is drinking in. In fact one of the objectives with television is to lull the conscious mind into a semi-sleep state at which point the subconscious mind, which never sleeps, is more open to suggestion – this is the area they want to manipulate. This way you think the thoughts you think are yours when really they’re simply the ingredients applied to the mixture prior to ‘setting’.

Our media machine in actual fact creates and nurtures the mind of the paedophile. This might sound far-fetched but when you’re fortunate enough to have relevent clips that would ordinarily be separated out over days or weeks spliced together in a more succinct and immediate context, it becomes much more obvious that whats really going on here is absolutely grotesque. However, to demonstrate I don’t have to look far unfortunately.

“Towelhead” is written and directed by Alan Ball, the man behind “Six Feet Under” and “American Beauty.” But it’s caused outrage for its graphic depiction of sexual, mental and physical child abuse that verges quite literally on kiddie porn.

The movie, so odious that many people have simply walked out during the screenings, shows actor Aaron Eckhart having sex with a 13-year-old girl played by a now 19-year-old actress, Summer Bishil. The actress only turned 19 recently however, which means that she was just on the cusp of 18 when she made the movie last year. (dated 2010)

The fact that this film has been funded at all is evidence that there are some pretty questionable individuals working within media. The video I wanted to use was an interview Eckhart did with ESPN or CNN in which he was swooned over and praised for taking on such a challenging role by the pitiful news anchors before they encouraged all to go and see the film, but I was unable to find it. I’m thankful though that on sourcing the following interview viewing stats were relatively low on many of the videos I came across.


Never-the-less, ultimately you have to ask yourself what kind of person would endeavour to see a film of this kind and more importantly, how the film affects the subconscious of two categories : 1. An individual already interested in material of this nature, and 2. An individual who hasn’t previously been interested in material of this nature.

Predominantly though the main theme of the movie is the sexualisation of the child and this is something that a lot of ill but powerful people on the world stage are striving to pursue as its gradual acceptance would suit their own sicknesses. This notion might be laughed at and claimed to be paranoia or hysteria.

Larry King – John Decamp’s attempt at child sex ring exposure, Named in testimonies surrounding The Franklin Cover-Up, Troy Boner (do the digging yourself on this one), (The Franklin child prostitution ring allegations were a series of allegations and legal actions surrounding an alleged child sex ring serving prominent citizens of Omaha Nebraska as well as high-level U.S. politicians. The scandal centered around the actions of Lawrence E. King. King eventually served 10 years of a 15-year prison sentence when convicted of embezzling thirty-eight million dollars as manager of the Franklin Community Federal Credit Union in Nebraska. He was later served with a $1 million default judgment after he failed to appear in court to respond to civil charges of kidnapping and child abuse. On February 1, 1991, former Nebraska state senator John DeCamp filed a civil suit on behalf of Paul Bonacci, against the Catholic Archbishop of Omaha and Lawrence E. King, as well as businessmen Peter Citron, Alan Baer, Harold Andersen, Michael Hoch, Kenneth Bovasso and other Nebraska persons and institutions) More detailed reading in footnotes

I could get really into some of my own research but this gets very deep indeed and brings catastrophic events such as the Dunblane Massacre and it’s subsequent DA-Notice into a more questionable light if I were to concentrate more on a British perspective. For the moment though I’d advise looking into heroes such as John Decamp or former head of the FBI Ted Gunderson who’ve spent decades trying to expose high level government and police officials involved in sexual abuse. (footnotes)

It’s very much sleight of hand. On the one side mainstream media will crucify the sex offender if it further creates the perpetual state of fear within the subconscious mind of the viewer I mentioned in the opening paragraphs, but on the other it nurtures and protects the paedophile.

Modern society has become very secular in nature. People don’t know their neighbours and view anyone who isn’t part of their immediate family circle with the utmost suspicion (and even then in some cases immediate family I’m sure). The media response to high-profile child abuse cases and successive government knee-jerk legislation, (particularly that which applies an over-zealous emphasis on, ‘child safety’), are largely to blame.

As a result we currently have people of different generations who won’t communicate in public and view anyone who even remotely deviates from the accepted norm with suspicion or even contempt. The hypnotic functionalities of television are so effective, that we even suspect ourselves or rather, become super-conscious of our own outwardly perceived behavioural characteristics around other different generations. Adults no longer talk to children for fear of being accused of something heinous, despite there being no foundation and this outcome has been absolutely designed to within the finest degree.

This is Royal Institute of International Affairs and Tavistock policy being played out by the droves of malleable walking zombies we have allowed ourselves to become. Just one ‘drip’ in the continual War of Attrition.

People like Tony Blair and those who work for think tanks such as The Fabian Society, DEMOS, The Royal Institute of International Affairs, Tavistock Institute etc, and to some extent Common Purpose which serves as a networking and training avenue encompassing the aforementioned, have an excellent understanding of the broad spectrum of methods used to attack the general publics’ collective consciousness relentlessly, and seek to implement them whilst projecting an empathetic, morally just animus perception to the public. We need only acknowledge the emblem of the Fabian Society (of which Tony Blair holds membership) and it’s wolf in sheep’s clothing.

… nothing is hidden from us.

This collusion between media bodies and some of the above mentioned organisations should have us condemn mainstream media on its own merit, but we don’t. Why?

One should become symbolically literate and build the ability to recognise the methods used to effect negative change in society. What these publicly funded bodies are doing to the individual subconscious mind through television is so subtle and so veiled behind a contrived outward perception of having good intentions, and they’ve become so good at doing it, that its very easy indeed to allow one’s self to become swept up in all the clouded waters of social engineering without even realising you fell in to it.

It’s important to resist the temptation to attack the child killer or the sex offender who are themselves indications of a much more sophisticated induction of mental illness by proxy so to speak. Television is their primary weapon against us and we must begin to ask some very damning questions about the kind of people influencing our media. Instead we applaud the newscasting vultures as they strip the bones of what are essentially merely symptoms of socio-engineering and mainstream media’s own willingness to accommodate and implement such agendas.

It would be fantastic if we could work up anger pictured toward the real manipulators.


Footnotes :

Dead Beat Dads Association –

Burnistoun –

Franklin Child Prostitution Ring –

Ted Gunderson –

John Decamp –

%d bloggers like this: